Oshkosh

Posts from the Yahoo Groups mailing list.
dickoreilly

Re: Oshkosh

Post by dickoreilly »

Two years was Carpenter's guess.

Mark's current battery pack is built-in and weighs 170 lbs.

Dick O'Reilly
edoerr2224

Re: Oshkosh

Post by edoerr2224 »

Is Mark using  Lithium - ion   or Lithium iron  po4  batteries  ?
dickoreilly

Re: Oshkosh

Post by dickoreilly »

Don't know. System is from Zero bicycle manufacturer. He said he's planning a different. Battery installation that will allow quick-change battery pack units. Now has to recharge battery pack in place.

Dick O'Reilly
blaswichk

Re: Oshkosh

Post by blaswichk »

That’s why he kicked my butt on climb-out together at Arlington for our video flight.
earthstaraircraft

Re: Oshkosh

Post by earthstaraircraft »

Hi
Mark is using Zero Battery's and they are LiNcO It is a type of Lithium
Ion, If I used the LiFePo4 I would have 1/2 the range, and fly for only 1/2
hr. one of my flights at Oshkosh was over 1;10.
Don't worry to much about that misinterpretation of FAR 103. Fly safe and
keep out of controlled airspace. That's what I have been told.
Happy Flying
Mark


In a message dated 7/31/2013 12:26:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
edoerr2224@yahoo.com writes:





Is Mark using Lithium - ion or Lithium iron po4 batteries ?
edoerr2224

Re: Oshkosh

Post by edoerr2224 »

Aerovolt    Lifepo4   is 336 watts  at 3  lbs  .  24 batteries is   72 lbs  and 8040 watts.   If a cruise  speed is   72 volts at  50amps   that's  2 +  hours of flight  at a much lighter load.     I cant find info on LiNcO  batteries?  Litium iron  should only be  14.4 % lighter  but  far safer.   I m just  very interested in  the  Egull plane to fly around southern Illinois outside of controlled space .    Ed
earthstaraircraft

Re: Oshkosh

Post by earthstaraircraft »

Hi Ed
The 336 rating on your Battery is probably cranking amps, this would not be
the hr rate witch would probably less, Would you check this for me,
Happy Flying
Mark


In a message dated 8/13/2013 7:22:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
edoerr2224@yahoo.com writes:





Aerovolt Lifepo4 is 336 watts at 3 lbs . 24 batteries is 72
lbs and 8040 watts. If a cruise speed is 72 volts at 50amps that's
2 + hours of flight at a much lighter load. I cant find info on
LiNcO batteries? Litium iron should only be 14.4 % lighter but far safer.
I m just very interested in the Egull plane to fly around southern
Illinois outside of controlled space . Ed
earthstaraircraft

Re: Oshkosh

Post by earthstaraircraft »

Hi Ed
If we were to use as little as 74 v we would need at least 100 A to cruse
if the battery were light.
Happy Flying
Mark



In a message dated 8/13/2013 7:22:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
edoerr2224@yahoo.com writes:





Aerovolt Lifepo4 is 336 watts at 3 lbs . 24 batteries is 72
lbs and 8040 watts. If a cruise speed is 72 volts at 50amps that's
2 + hours of flight at a much lighter load. I cant find info on
LiNcO batteries? Litium iron should only be 14.4 % lighter but far safer.
I m just very interested in the Egull plane to fly around southern
Illinois outside of controlled space . Ed
edoerr2224

Re: Oshkosh

Post by edoerr2224 »

I actually  multiplied wrong  It is  a 13.2 volt battery  at 28 amps of storage   or 380 watts .  The cranking amps are 500 amps.  But Ive spent the morning updating my  files  on the new Batteries  and  there is some interesting  up sizing going on.   I want to verify  some of the data.   So  Cruise speed  requires  approximately  7000  watts  . A  2 hour  flight  needs  14000 watts  plus taxi and  takeoff .      Ed
Locked